Ford dealership building
Operational PM Project · Initiated, Scoped & Delivered Independently · 2026

Warranty
LocatR

Organisation
Haynes Brothers Ltd
Role
Product Owner & Developer
Stack
Node.js · React · SQLite
Status
Live in production
01 — The Problem

A compliance risk
with no owner

Haynes Brothers operates under Ford warranty obligations requiring all parts removed during a warranty repair to be physically retained for a minimum of three months. Ford can request any part at any point.

If a part cannot be produced, the entire warranty claim is voided — a financial exposure running into thousands of pounds per incident. Before Warranty LocatR, there was no process, no record, and no visibility.

  • 01 Parts could not be located when Ford requested them, voiding claims
  • 02 No record of who checked a part in, when, or where it was placed
  • 03 No early warning for parts approaching the 3-month retention deadline
  • 04 No formal process for logging or responding to Ford recall requests
  • 05 No visibility over whether technicians placed parts in the correct area
Warranty parts laid out on a grid
10–15
Warranty parts processed
per day across both departments
<60s
Average part retrieval time
vs. 15–25 mins manual search
£5k+
Potential cost of a single
voided Ford warranty claim
6
Active users across
4 role-based permission levels
System Documentation

Full feature documentation, role architecture, workflow breakdown, and security overview — for a complete technical and operational picture.

Download System Overview
PM Competencies Demonstrated
Initiation

Identified the business need independently, defined scope, and built the case for the solution without being asked — the same judgement a PM applies before a project brief exists.

Planning & Scope

Defined what the system would and wouldn't do upfront. Role-based permissions, mandatory fields, and structured workflows were scope decisions — made before a single line of code was written.

Stakeholder Management

Four distinct stakeholder roles with different needs, responsibilities, and information access. The Recall Manager's view was built around Chris's actual job — not a generic admin panel.

Risk Management

Every feature maps to a specific operational risk: overdue alerts address the retention risk, the recall log addresses audit risk, mandatory fields address data quality risk. Risk-first design.

Governance & Audit

Every action in the system is attributed by name and timestamp. The Recall Log, retention reports, and handover confirmations exist because compliance to Ford must be evidenced — not assumed.

Requirements Gathering

The system was built around how the team actually works — not how a developer imagined they worked. The Parts Advisor check-in flow, the 72-hour overdue threshold, the Recall Manager role — all came from understanding the real workflow first.

Change Management

The team went from no process to a structured daily system. That's a behaviour change — not just a software rollout. Designing a system people would actually use required as much people thinking as technical thinking.

Benefits Realisation

The system was never the goal — zero voided claims and a defensible audit trail were. Every feature decision was tested against that outcome. The benefits are measurable, live, and ongoing.

02 — How It Works
01

Check In

Parts Advisors log each warranty part immediately after removal — six mandatory fields enforced. The form cannot be submitted incomplete, ensuring data integrity from the first touchpoint.

02

Collection Confirmation

Before a warehouse location is assigned, physical collection must be confirmed with a timestamp — creating a clear handover record from holding area to warehouse custody.

03

Locate & Log

Each part is assigned an exact warehouse location with optional condition notes. Every action is attributed to a named user with a timestamp, building a fully defensible audit trail.

04

Instant Retrieval

Any user can search by Part Number, WIP Code, or description. Fuzzy matching means a wrong part number can still surface the right part — a deliberate safety net against data entry errors.

05

Ford Recall Response

When Ford emails a recall request, the Recall Manager triggers a Ford Recall Request in the system. An immediate red alert fires to the Admin dashboard. Resolution is logged with a full timestamped audit trail.

Smart Search results showing fuzzy part search
Warranty LocatR dashboard showing 7 stat cards
Live Dashboard

Full operational
visibility at a glance

The Dashboard gives Admins and Recall Managers a real-time overview of everything in the system. Seven live stat cards surface what matters: total active parts, unlocated parts, overdue parts flagged at 72 hours, upcoming expirations, and a split by department.

Any unresolved Ford recall request triggers a persistent red banner — impossible to miss, immediately actionable.

Retention Management

Never miss
a deadline again

Every part tracked in the system automatically approaches its 3-month Ford retention deadline on a countdown. A 14-day expiry warning fires before the deadline. Parts auto-move to a Disposal folder at 3 months and are permanently deleted two weeks later.

The Expiring Soon page presents a colour-coded table — red under 14 days, amber at 14–21 days, green at 21–30 — so priority is immediate and unambiguous. Admin can export a monthly retention report as a CSV in one click.

Ford Recall Response

A defensible record
for every request

When Ford emails a recall request, the Recall Manager logs it directly in Warranty LocatR. The system finds the part, timestamps the request, and fires an immediate alert to the Admin dashboard. Resolution is confirmed in the system and recorded for audit.

Every recall request — past and present — is stored in the Recall Log with a complete timestamped audit trail. If Ford ever challenges a claim, the evidence is there.

03 — Impact

From zero visibility
to full control

Before Warranty LocatR, the business was running a compliance and financial risk with no process to manage it. A single voided Ford warranty claim can cost upwards of £5,000. The system eliminates that exposure through structure, not chance.

Across 10–15 parts processed per day, it also returns significant time — removing a 15–25 minute manual search process and replacing it with a sub-60 second lookup for any user on any device.

Metric Before After
Part retrieval time15–25 minsUnder 60 seconds
Audit trailNone100% — every action timestamped
Recall response processUnstructuredLogged, alerted & resolved in system
Overdue part visibilityNoneReal-time dashboard alert at 72hrs
Expiry risk managementManual — if rememberedAutomated — 14-day warning + CSV export
Voided claims since launchRisk unmanagedZero
System running costN/AFlat Replit hosting fee only
04 — What This Demonstrates

Problem Identification

I recognised a compliance and financial risk that had no owner, no process, and no visibility — and initiated a solution entirely unprompted. This is the instinct a PM brings before a project brief exists.

Stakeholder Design

The four-role permission model was a stakeholder decision, not a technical one. I mapped each role to their actual responsibilities and built access around how they work — requirements gathering applied to a real team.

Governance & Audit Trail

Every feature was built with defensibility in mind — timestamped actions, named users, retention reports, recall logs. This is PRINCE2 governance thinking: assume you will need to evidence compliance, and build for it from day one.

End-to-End Ownership

Initiation through to live production — scoping, stakeholder mapping, build, deployment, user management, and ongoing ownership. This project was managed with the same structure I would bring to any formal PM engagement.

Delivery Under Constraint

No budget, no team, no specification. Built and live at flat hosting cost, processing 10–15 parts per day. Constraints are not blockers — they're the conditions under which real delivery happens.

Measurable Benefits Realised

Zero voided Ford warranty claims since deployment. A 15–25 minute search process reduced to under 60 seconds. These aren't projected benefits — they're live, sustained outcomes from a system in daily use.

The Bigger Picture

This project wasn't about building an app.
It was about identifying a business risk, defining a solution, managing its delivery, and realising measurable benefits — with no instruction and no team.

That sequence — problem identification, scope definition, stakeholder mapping, delivery, governance, benefits realisation — is the PM lifecycle. Warranty LocatR demonstrates it end-to-end, in a live commercial environment, at real operational scale. The certifications confirm the methodology. This project proves the application.